Re: [GENERAL] Connection options
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Connection options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a9020285-420a-8138-7147-47cc0b67ed5c@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Connection options (Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/15/2017 02:41 PM, Igor Korot wrote: > Hi, David, > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David G. Johnston > <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Igor Korot <ikorot01@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> And could you clarify on the first part of this? >>> From the quote I poste it sounds like this is available only in >>> command-line >>> tools. And if someone will use it inside the program it will be ignored. >> >> >> The options you pass from the client via the "options" attribute are >> interpreted by *the server* as command-line options. They are not options >> that control libpq itself. > > Can you give an example or try to explain it? > What do you mean by "interpreted by the server as command-line options"? > > Does this mean I can just ignore this parameter inside my C{++} program? > Or I can set some options and pass it to the server thru this parameter? > >> >> I can kinda see the confusion here but I'm not sure how to write it more >> clearly without being excessively verbose. I haven't seen this particular >> confusion before so I'd say the wording is reasonable and the mailing lists >> are doing their job of providing a forum for providing clarity. > > Well for someone who is just started with PostgreSQL and C interface it is > confusing. Maybe this will help: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/libpq-example.html > > Thank you. > >> >> David J. >> -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: