Re: make world and install-world without docs
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make world and install-world without docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a8cede36-9f8a-466e-0a6d-1d88a73861ed@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make world and install-world without docs (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: make world and install-world without docs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01.07.21 16:47, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 6/2/21 4:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> I'm inclined to agree with Alvaro that the messages are at best an >>> oddity. Standard Unix practice is to be silent on success. >> We've been steadily moving towards less chatter during builds. >> I'd be good with dropping these messages in HEAD, but doing so >> in the back branches might be inadvisable. > OK, I think on reflection new targets will be cleaner. What I suggest is > the attached, applied to all branches, followed by removal of the four > noise messages in just HEAD. This naming approach is a bit problematic. For example, we have "install-bin" in src/backend/, which is specifically for only installing binaries, not data files etc. (hence the name). Your proposal would confuse this scheme. I think we should also take a step back here and consider: We had "all", which wasn't "all" enough, then we had "world", now we have "world-minus-a-bit", but it's still more than "all". It's like we are trying to prove the continuum hypothesis here. I think we had consensus on the make variable approach, so I'm confused why a different solution was committed and backpatched without discussion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: