Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a872cdd08b79a7f507c392542bdd4cd4@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively
Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-08-18 14:50, Chapman Flack wrote: > Now, my guess is EXPLAIN is complaining when it sees the Const > of type internal, and doesn't know how to show that value. > Perhaps makeRelabelType is the answer there, too: what if the > Const has Oid type, so EXPLAIN can show it, and what's inserted > as the function argument is a relabel node saying it's internal? Simply changing the Const to be of type Oid makes EXPLAIN happy, and nothing ever says "hey, why are you passing this oid for an arg that wants internal?". This is without adding any relabel nodes anywhere. Seq Scan on pg_temp.test_jsonb Output: pg_catalog.jsonb_array_element_type('23'::oid, test_json, 0), (test_json -> 0) Filter: (test_jsonb.json_type = 'scalarint'::text) Nothing in that EXPLAIN output to make you think anything weird was going on, unless you went and looked up jsonb_array_element_type and saw that its arg0 isn't oid and its return type isn't int4. But I don't know that adding relabel nodes wouldn't still be the civilized thing to do. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: