Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers.
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a842fbdf-b761-bf21-47dd-cd87d05a8d04@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] Questionaire: Common WAL write rates on busy servers.
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 04/27/2017 08:59 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > Ok, based on the, few, answers I've got so far, my experience is indeed > skewed. A number of the PG users I interacted with over the last couple > years had WAL write ranges somewhere in the range of 500MB/s to 2.2GB/s > (max I'veseen). At that point WAL insertion became a major bottleneck, > even if storage was more than fast enough to keep up. To address these > we'd need some changes, but the feedback so far suggest that it's not > yet a widespread issue... I would agree it isn't yet a widespread issue. The only people that are likely going to see this are going to be on bare metal. We should definitely plan on that issue for say 11. I do have a question though, where you have seen this issue is it with synchronous_commit on or off? Thanks, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: