Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a72c2b1c-d45b-b756-db3f-77315119498a@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing? (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Thoughts on unit testing?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/10/17 17:53, Thomas Munro wrote: > The current regression tests, isolation tests and TAP tests are very > good (though I admit my experience with TAP is limited), but IMHO we > are lacking support for C-level unit testing. Complicated, fiddly > things with many states, interactions, edge cases etc can be hard to > get full test coverage on from the outside. Consider > src/backend/utils/mmgr/freepage.c as a case in point. I don't have a good idea how to address this, but I agree that something in this area would be widely useful. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: