Re: SCSI vs SATA
От | Alex Deucher |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a728f9f90704050910sbd112c6x9a03a5eff18e16fc@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCSI vs SATA ("jason@ohloh.net" <jason@ohloh.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 4/5/07, jason@ohloh.net <jason@ohloh.net> wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Ron wrote: > > > BE VERY WARY OF USING AN ADAPTEC RAID CONTROLLER! > > Thanks - I received similar private emails with the same advice. I > will change the controller to a LSI MegaRAID SAS 8408E -- any > feedback on this one? We use the LSI SAS1064 SAS chips and they've been great. > > > > > IME, they are usually the worst of the commodity RAID controllers > > available. > > I've often seen SW RAID outperform them. > > > > If you are going to use this config, Tyan's n3600M (AKA S2932) MB > > has a variant that comes with 8 SAS + 6 SATA II connectors. > > The SKU is S2932WG2NR. > > http://www.tyan.us/product_board_detail.aspx?pid=453 > > I plan on leveraging the battery backed module so onboard sas isn't a > priority for me. > > > I'm using this beast (Dual Socket F, AMD Barcelona ready, 16 DIMMS > > supporting up to 64GB of ECC RAM, 2 PCI-Ex16 slots w/ PCI-Ex8 > > signalling, etc: > > ~$450 US w/o SAS, ~$500 US w/ SAS) for my most recent pg 8.2.3 > > build on top of XFS. > > I'm curious to know why you're on xfs (i've been too chicken to stray > from ext3). I've had great performance with jfs, however there are some issues with it on certain bigendian platforms. > > > If the on board RAID is or becomes inadequate to your needs, I'd > > strongly suggest either 3ware or Areca RAID controllers. > > I don't know why, but my last attempt at using an areca 1120 w/ linux > on amd64 (and > 4gb ram) was disastrous - i will never use them > again. 3ware's been rock solid for us. > > > > > Side Note: > > What kind of HDs are the 8*73GB ones? If they are the new 2.5" > > Savvio 15Ks, be =VERY= careful about having proper power and > > cooling for them. > > 14 HD's in one case are going to have a serious transient load on > > system start up and (especially with those SAS HDs) can generate a > > great deal of heat. > > I went w/ Fujitsu. Fortunately these servers are hosted in a very > well ventilated area so i am not that concerned with heat issues. > We have the 2.5" drives (seagates and fujitsus) and they have been reliable and performed well. Alex
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: