Re: SELECT INTO deprecation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SELECT INTO deprecation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a71c0215-3ab1-abab-babe-2778b17aa1d7@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SELECT INTO deprecation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SELECT INTO deprecation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-12-03 16:34, Tom Lane wrote: > As I recall, a whole lot of the pain we have with INTO has to do > with the semantics we've chosen for INTO in a set-operation nest. > We think you can write something like > > SELECT ... INTO foo FROM ... UNION SELECT ... FROM ... > > but we insist on the INTO being in the first component SELECT. > I'd like to know exactly how much of that messiness is shared > by SQL Server. On sqlfiddle.com, this works: select a into t3 from t1 union select a from t2; but this gets an error: select a from t1 union select a into t4 from t2; SELECT INTO must be the first query in a statement containing a UNION, INTERSECT or EXCEPT operator.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: