pg_rewind and WAL size...
От | marin@kset.org |
---|---|
Тема | pg_rewind and WAL size... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a66e45e5d649668bd18f40770eafdedf@kset.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pg_rewind and WAL size...
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi, I did a series of test to see the WAL size impact of enabling data checksums/wal_log_hints on our databases (so that we can use pg_rewind to fix split brain situations). Having a set of servers available the last few days I did a few tests. Here are the results: No data checksums and wal_log_hints=off : createdb benchdisk pgbench -i -s 10000 benchdisk -> This creates a WAL archive of 121GB pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -t 100000 benchdisk -> The WAL archive is now 167GB. Increase of 167 - 121 = 46GB pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -t 100000 -N benchdisk -> The WAL archive is now 209GB. Increase of 209 - 167 = 42GB Data checksums or wal_log_hints=on : createdb benchdisk pgbench -i -s 10000 benchdisk -> This creates a WAL archive of 245GB pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -t 100000 benchdisk -> The WAL archive is now 292GB. Increase of 292 - 245 = 47GB pgbench -c 32 -j 16 -t 100000 -N benchdisk -> The WAL archive is now 334GB. Increase of 334 - 292 = 42GB The tests run on two identical servers on a freshly initialized data folder. During the testing for read-write and simple write test I expected some additional WAL volume (a couple of percentages is tolerable), but the 100% increase when creating the test database is very disturbing. I assume a dump/restore would work the same way. Am I doing something wrong? Would tweaking some checkpoint parameters help reduce the WAL volume? I was planing to turn data checksums on (for data integrity) for a larger migration but with this numbers I would have to turn it off, and use the wal_log_hints after the loading. Regards, Mladen Marinović
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: