Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms)
От | Krzysztof Plocharz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a5cb4527-b9df-7965-9f86-5cbe94f41a5c@9livesdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planning performance problem (67626.278ms) (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 2019/04/08 16:33, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > po 8. 4. 2019 v 16:11 odesílatel Krzysztof Plocharz > <plocharz@9livesdata.com <mailto:plocharz@9livesdata.com>> napsal: > > Hi > > We have some very strange query planning problem. Long story short it > takes 67626.278ms just to plan. Query execution takes 12ms. > > Query has 7 joins and 2 subselects. > It looks like the issue is not deterministic, sometimes is takes few ms > to plan the query. > > One of the tables has 550,485,942 live tuples and 743,504,012 dead > tuples. Running ANALYZE on that tables solves the problem only > temporarily. > > Question is how can we debug what is going on? > > > please check your indexes against bloating. Planner get min and max from > indexes and this operation is slow on bloat indexes. > Yes, we thought about this, there are over 700,000,000 dead tuples. But as you said, it should not result in 67 second planning... > but 67 sec is really slow - it can be some other other problem - it is > real computer or virtual? > real, with pretty good specs: NVME drives, Six-Core AMD Opteron, 64GB of ram. During testing system was mostly idle. > > Best Regards, > Krzysztof Płocharz > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: