Re: Why is parula failing?
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is parula failing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a5c998c6-0518-4e44-bff7-b9afb6720f16@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is parula failing? (Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/13/24 15:02, Robins Tharakan wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 10:24, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade. >> Again reltuples == 48. > > Here's what I can add over the past few days: > - Almost all failures are either reltuples=48 or SIGABRTs > - Almost all SIGABRTs are DDLs - CREATE INDEX / CREATE AGGREGATEs / CTAS > - A little too coincidental? Recent crashes have stack-trace if > interested. > > Barring the initial failures (during move to gcc 13.2), in the past week: > - v15 somehow hasn't had a failure yet > - v14 / v16 have got only 1 failure each > - but v12 / v13 are lit up - failed multiple times. > I happened to have an unused rpi5, so I installed Armbian aarch64 with gcc 13.2.0, built with exactly the same configure options as parula, and did ~300 loops of "make check" without a single failure. So either parula has packages in a different way, or maybe it's a more of a timing issue and rpi5 is way slower than graviton3. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: