Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

On 2/22/17 8:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Actually, I think matviews really need to be the absolute last thing.
>> What if you had a matview that referenced publications or subscriptions?
>> I'm guessing that would be broken right now.
> I'm not sure what you have in mind here.  Publications and subscriptions
> don't interact with materialized views, so the relative order doesn't
> really matter.

CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW tmv AS SELECT * FROM pg_subscription;
SELECT 0

IOW, you can create matviews that depend on any other 
table/view/matview, but right now if the matview includes certain items 
it will mysteriously end up empty post-restore.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)