Re: DBD::Pg performance bites compared to DBD::mysql?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
> Cool.  Thanks for doing that.  Do you have an idea when 1.44 will
> be out?

Not really, I'm afraid. I was tracking down a quoting issue this weekend
and have now gone down a twisty path that induced ripping out and
rewriting most of the "type" and quoting code, which is now lying in
pieces in my work directory. :) If I get the time to finish it soon, maybe
a release in two weeks or so. Otherwise, I might just back out the changes
and release the new do() as 1.44.

And if everyone reading this who uses DBD::Pg could test the code in cvs
right now, that would be greatly appreciated: there were some substantial
changes that I'd love to catch any bugs on before rather than after the
next release. I'll even roll up a tarball for your testing pleasure:

http://www.gtsm.com/DBD-Pg-1.43_1.tar.gz

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200508212142
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDCS6KvJuQZxSWSsgRAkzKAKCvCzjpvpzVSdqCrL4VLy0vkDj5rwCgwYz6
TNfaqozZ4aUUuaY4YeuFGsI=
=YpRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----