Re: Recomended front ends?

On 8/27/19 8:04 AM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 7:49 PM Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> wrote:
> 
>> Django lets you use "unmanaged" tables, but it is quite noticeable that
>> this isn't the primary use case.
> 
> It isn't, but it's the best way to use Django for database-literate
> people. It's enough to ignore the Django sale pitch of the database as
> a replaceable element and just assume Postgres. In Docker times you
> don't need SQLite to create a poorly representative "development
> database".

Django takes Postgres as it's reference database which makes things 
easier, especially when you add in 
contrib.postgres(https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/contrib/postgres/)


> 
> You can just ignore the Django ORM for the whole data-definition layer
> and migrations: you can have your database schema, with comments, in
> your source code, with strict control of what's in the db (exotic
> index definitions, exclusion constraints, writable views...) and only
> use the ORM to read and manipulate data, as long as the Django model
> "resembles" the database table.
> Schema migrations are easy to deal with using SQL patches [1], and
> complete, unlike any Model-based migration system.

+1

> 
> Using the Django ORM to create complex queries is a joy (especially
> nesting subqueries), and you don't lose all the other Django
> facilities (decent auth model, decent CRUD interface, customisation
> when "decent" is not enough).
> 
> [1] https://gist.github.com/dvarrazzo/4161070
> 
> -- Daniele
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com