Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> How would this go with PostgreSQL?  You can use the bug form on the web
> site, but you can't attach any code, so the bug will just linger and
> ultimately put more burden on a core contributor to deal with the
> minutiae of developing, testing, and committing a trivial fix and
> sending feedback to the submitter.

Well, they could attach a link to a github patch...

> Or the user could take the high road and develop and patch and submit it. 
> Just make sure it's in context diff format!  Search the wiki if you don't 
> know how to do that!  Send it to -hackers, your email will be held for 
> moderation.  We won't actually do anything with your patch, but we will 
> tell you to add it to that commitfest app over there.  You need to sign up 
> for an account to use that.  We will deal with your patch in one or two months. 
> But only if you review another patch.  And you should sign up for that 
> other mailing list, to make sure you're doing it right.  Chances are, the 
> first review you're going to get is that your patch doesn't apply anymore, 
> but which time you will have lost interest in the patch anyway.

+1 to all that. Especially the signing up for the commitfest app.

> Of course, Gerrit doesn't actually address most of the issues above, but
> it could be part of a step forward.

More of a step sideways. It doesn't address the bigger problems.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201302081124
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlEVJrkACgkQvJuQZxSWSshh3gCgz+XHwAbk5rryttYPi68j4EJi
7DcAnjEdxDD4Rm2/oDBaqHbOzQLwR6zR
=0lnp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2~