Fwd: COPY FROM command v8.1.4
От | Peter Childs |
---|---|
Тема | Fwd: COPY FROM command v8.1.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a2de01dd0609120217ncfd2c21l7cdefa5d3cad9154@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | COPY FROM command v8.1.4 ("Mr. Dan" <bitsandbytes88@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Sorry Tom, Somone had not put the reply to header in correctly...... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Childs <peterachilds@gmail.com> Date: 12-Sep-2006 10:16 Subject: Re: [ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4 To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> On 11/09/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Mr. Dan" <bitsandbytes88@hotmail.com> writes: > > We have a table with 12028587 records in it. > > We do a COPY TO file of the records for this table. > > We count the number of records in the file, it has 12028587 lines. > > We do a COPY FROM that file into a table with identical structure as the > > first table. > > We count the number of records in the second table and there are only > > 12028538 records. > > Try dumping the second table with COPY TO and diff'ing the dump files > to get more detail about what's missing. > > If you repeat the entire experiment, are the same records missing each > time? I'm wondering about flaky hardware as much as anything. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > I presume your doing a select count(*) from table not reading the stats from vacuum verbose or pg_class.... I know it sounds stupid but its a common mistake and vacuum is only a guess Peter Childs
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: