Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a2c99917-6c31-f87d-af5c-588493dc6577@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL 10: Call for Quotes
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 08/31/2017 08:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 26 July 2017 at 20:16, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > Given this info also earlier noted this post > https://www.infoq.com/news/2017/04/postgresql-10-features > > I propose the feature list as this > > * Logical Replication > * Native Table Partitioning > * Improved Query Parallelism > * Quorum Commit for Synchronous Replication > * SCRAM-SHA-256 strong authentication > > Any objection to me updating the docs to say that now, subject to > further discussion? I would argue that Traceable commit is just as interesting as Quorum Commit (and likely applies to a larger audience). I would also argue that SCRAM-SHA-256 isn't as "big feature" as we would like it to be as we have supported strong authentication through external mechanisms for a very long time. Other than that, I have no comments and yes we should update the page. JD > > It's better to have something in place soon, even if it is updated later. > -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: