Re: Does btrfs on Linux have a negative performance impact for PostgreSQL 13?
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does btrfs on Linux have a negative performance impact for PostgreSQL 13? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a2ae956b-d98f-4041-4e49-e37626684be4@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does btrfs on Linux have a negative performance impact for PostgreSQL 13? (Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 4/24/21 9:02 PM, Christophe Pettus wrote: > > >> On Apr 24, 2021, at 11:27, Simon Connah <simon.n.connah@protonmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm curious, really. I use btrfs as my filesystem on my home systems and am setting up a server as I near releasing myproject. I planned to use btrfs on the server, but it got me thinking about PostgreSQL 13. Does anyone know if it wouldhave a major performance impact? > > This is a few years old, but Tomas Vondra did a presentation comparing major Linux file systems for PostgreSQL: > > https://www.slideshare.net/fuzzycz/postgresql-on-ext4-xfs-btrfs-and-zfs > That talk was ages ago, though. The general conclusions may be still valid, but maybe btrfs improved a lot - I haven't done any testing since then. Not sure about durability, but there are companies using btrfs so perhaps it's fine - not sure. Arguably, a lot of this also depends on the exact workload - the issues I saw with btrfs were with OLTP stress test, it could have performed much better with other workloads. regards Tomas
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: