Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a240a4e9-dcfa-df00-c725-3cb98b62cc23@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/25/2017 05:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: >> I understand that my experience with storage devices is unusually >> narrow compared to everyone else here. That's why I remain neutral on >> the high level question of whether or not we ought to enable checksums >> by default. I'll ask other hackers to answer what may seem like a very >> naive question, while bearing what I just said in mind. The question >> is: Have you ever actually seen a checksum failure in production? And, >> if so, how helpful was it? No. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: