Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a1aa78544af9cfda7c505876591e95dc@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL Challenge: Arbitrary Cross-tab
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Nope; Gaetano's right, you cannot assume that. It's entirely possible > for the planner to choose different plans depending on the OFFSET. > (Maybe not very likely, with such small offsets, but could happen.) Interesting. I realized that there was a finite chance of different plans being chosen, but it seemed neigh-impossible since there is no WHERE clause and the offsets only vary from 0-7. What sort of different plans would it choose, out of curiosity? Seq-scan vs. index-scan? Are there any particular cases where the same plan is guaranteed to be used? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200408192216 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFBJV9xvJuQZxSWSsgRAp74AJ96mtrKC1J53y0TPqTPdq2Xost0fACg4DnJ 7P+dgpHWBazGNE9+SR7uxLY= =MZuM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: