Re: I don't understand that EXPLAIN PLAN timings
От | Jean-Christophe Boggio |
---|---|
Тема | Re: I don't understand that EXPLAIN PLAN timings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a09afdae-c2c2-48b3-982f-1e44f2bb31cd@thefreecat.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: I don't understand that EXPLAIN PLAN timings (Jean-Christophe Boggio <postgresql@thefreecat.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: I don't understand that EXPLAIN PLAN timings
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hello, In case it might be useful, I made some more tests. On my dev computer (a notebook) I installed: PostgreSQL 15.5 (Ubuntu 15.5-1.pgdg23.10+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0, 64-bit and PostgreSQL 16.1 (Ubuntu 16.1-1.pgdg23.10+1) on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0, 64-bit I adjusted work_mem to 1GB and disabled JIT, restored the same DB, did VACUUM ANALYZE and ran the query several times to lower I/O interference. Execution time is about the same on PG 14, 15 and 16, around ~120ms I noticed that planning time, whatever the version, is very variable between executions (ranging from 0.120ms to 0.400ms), probably due to other programs activity and <1ms measurements imprecision. So the results I gave you in my previous email are probably irrelevant. On our production server, which is running PG 14.10 on Debian 11, same work_mem, execution time is ~45ms but planning time is much more consistent at ~0.110ms Interestingly though, lowering work_mem to 32MB gives 22ms execution time but planning time rises consistently at ~0.7ms On my notebook with work_mem=32MB, execution time is also 22ms but planning time is lower at ~0.4ms (?!?) Let me know if I can do anything to provide you with more useful benchmark. The DB is still very small so it is easy to do tests. JC
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: