Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a05348feb82d78070bea9c0a03fcd572@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding PGInstaller to the Downloads section
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 2018-08-28 13:39, Dave Page wrote: <snip> > I did; > > *==>** The following existing directories will be made group writable:* > > /usr/local/bin > > /usr/local/lib > > /usr/local/share > > /usr/local/var > > *==>** The following existing directories will have their owner set to > * > *dpage*: > > /usr/local/bin > > /usr/local/lib > > /usr/local/share > > /usr/local/var > > *==>** The following existing directories will have their group set to > * > *admin*: > > /usr/local/bin > > /usr/local/lib > > /usr/local/share > > /usr/local/var > > I would rather we don't list a distro, than list one that we have to > put > security warnings against. Isn't OSX/macOS considered a "single user" system for the vast majority of its users? Note - I'm meaning "single person has access to the machine", rather than talking about the process separation model. For a single user machine, the above setup doesn't seem terrible. It's not giving world writeable access, it's just claiming ownership of otherwise unused directories for the main users group. ? Anyone using OSX/macOS in multi-user fashion is probably going to hit other issues too (eg other people's apps in /Applications), and probably :) avoids Homebrew. + Justin
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: