Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a00df256-98b6-7edd-54e9-ec1c68f258ba@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-11-23 We 16:59, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:00 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 9:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Are you saying you still think it's worth pursuing longpoll or similar methods for it, or that this is good enough? >> I personally think it'd be pretty neat, to squeeze out that last bit >> of latency. Maybe it's overkill... > I can't get excited about pursuing the last ~30 seconds of delay > for launching tasks that are going to run 10 or 20 or more minutes > (where the future trend of those numbers is surely up not down). > > The thing that was really significantly relevant here IMO was to > reduce the load on the central server, and I think we've done that. > Would adding longpoll reduce that further? In principle maybe, > but I'm not sure we have enough animals to make it worthwhile. > > Yeah, that's my feeling. We have managed to get a large improvement with a fairly small effort, I'm much less excited about getting another small improvement from a large effort. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: