Re: MobilityDB 1.2.0 - New upstream version

Hi,

MobilityDB has landed in Debian, but there's some problems with the
testsuite on various architectures:

On amd64, the 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl test is just slow:

733s 111/114 Test #112: 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl .......   Passed  431.44 sec

https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mobilitydb/testing/amd64/53684017/

On riscv64, it times out:

2933s         Start 110: 095_tnpoint_aggfuncs_tbl
2959s 109/114 Test #110: 095_tnpoint_aggfuncs_tbl ..........   Passed   25.99 sec
2959s         Start 111: 096_tnpoint_spatialrels
2960s 110/114 Test #111: 096_tnpoint_spatialrels ...........   Passed    0.92 sec
2960s         Start 112: 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl
4460s 111/114 Test #112: 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl .......***Timeout 1500.13 sec
4460s -- TEST_DIR: /tmp/test-17/tmptest
4460s -- TEST_DIR_DB: /tmp/test-17/tmptest/db
4460s -- TEST_DIR_LOCK: /tmp/test-17/tmptest/lock
4460s -- TEST_DIR_LOG: /tmp/test-17/tmptest/log
4460s -- TEST_DIR_OUT: /tmp/test-17/tmptest/out
4460s
4460s         Start 113: 097_tnpoint_tempspatialrels
4462s 112/114 Test #113: 097_tnpoint_tempspatialrels .......   Passed    1.42 sec
4462s         Start 114: 097_tnpoint_tempspatialrels_tbl
4466s 113/114 Test #114: 097_tnpoint_tempspatialrels_tbl ...   Passed    3.90 sec
4466s         Start   2: teardown
4466s 114/114 Test   #2: teardown ..........................   Passed    0.33 sec
4466s
4466s 99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 114
4466s
4466s Total Test time (real) = 4138.23 sec
4466s
4466s The following tests FAILED:
4466s     112 - 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl (Timeout)
4466s Errors while running CTest

https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mobilitydb/testing/riscv64/53697395/

On s390x, things don't work at all:

https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mobilitydb/testing/s390x/53683957/


Assuming big-endian just doesn't work, we can disable s390x and
friends. But 096_tnpoint_spatialrels_tbl is a pain point - would it be
possible to speed that test up such that it passes in, say, under a
minute on amd64? Then it would likely be fast enough to pass on
riscv64 as well.

Christoph