On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:17PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> And I believe that CONTEXT, if it exists, is augmentation information
> to the primary messages. The objective of the precedent for the use of
> relname_only was somewhat different, but this use also seems legit.
>
> In short, I think the distribution between message types (primary and
> context) is fine as it is in the latest patch.
Okay, thanks for the feedback.
--
Michael