Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?
Дата
Msg-id ZeE35_P5dXCm7u_m@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:10:26PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> why not just shovel these to standard_ProcessUtility.
> so ProcessUtility will looking consistent with (in format)
>  * ExecutorStart()
>  * ExecutorRun()
>  * ExecutorFinish()
>  * ExecutorEnd()

That's one of the points of the change: checking that only in
standard_ProcessUtility() may not be sufficient for utility hooks that
don't call standard_ProcessUtility(), so you'd stil want one in
ProcessUtility().
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake
Следующее
От: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby