Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file
Дата
Msg-id ZYT3YE4dN4bh1TQG@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: ci: Build standalone INSTALL file  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:22:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's a draft patch for this.  Most of it is mechanical removal of
> infrastructure for building the INSTALL file.  If anyone wants to
> bikeshed on the new wording of README, feel free.

Thanks for putting this together.  That looks reasonable.

> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 56d0c951a9..e40e610ccb 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -9,14 +9,13 @@ that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including
> -See the file INSTALL for instructions on how to build and install
> -PostgreSQL.  That file also lists supported operating systems and
> -hardware platforms and contains information regarding any other
> -software packages that are required to build or run the PostgreSQL
> -system.  Copyright and license information can be found in the
> -file COPYRIGHT.  A comprehensive documentation set is included in this
> -distribution; it can be read as described in the installation
> -instructions.
> +Copyright and license information can be found in the file COPYRIGHT.
> +
> +General documentation about this version of PostgreSQL can be found at:
> +https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/
> +In particular, information about building PostgreSQL from the source
> +code can be found at:
> +https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/installation.html

Sounds fine by me, including the extra step documented in
RELEASE_CHANGES.  No information is lost.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: int4->bool test coverage