Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
Дата
Msg-id ZXKfXjHhikO8yeIx@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:29:55PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> The comment atop trace_recovery [1] function says it should go away
> eventually and seems to have served the purpose when the recovery
> related code was introduced in PG 9.0.
>
> FWIW, the attached patch is what I've left with after removing
> trace_recovery_messages related code, 9 files changed, 19
> insertions(+), 97 deletions(-).

Looks acceptable to me.  Does somebody object to this removal?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrei Lepikhov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assert failure on 'list_member_ptr(rel->joininfo, restrictinfo)'
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: micro-optimizing json.c