On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 02:29:03PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 09:16, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> This interface from pgstat_prepare_io_time() is not really good,
>> because we could finish by setting io_start in the existing code paths
>> calling this routine even if track_io_timing is false when
>> track_wal_io_timing is true. Why not changing this interface a bit
>> and pass down a GUC (track_io_timing or track_wal_io_timing) as an
>> argument of the function depending on what we expect to trigger the
>> timings?
>
> Done in 0001.
One thing that 0001 missed is an update of the header where the
function is declared. I've edited a few things, and applied it to
start on this stuff. The rest will have to wait a bit more..
--
Michael