Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZV5vkqS87OgGdkcT@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Partial aggregates pushdown ("Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" <Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:16:16AM +0000, Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp wrote: > 2. Approach 2 > (1) Advantages > (a) No need to add partial aggregate functions to the catalogs for each aggregation > (2) Disadvantages > (a) Need to add non-standard keywords to the SQL syntax. > > I did not choose Approach2 because I was not confident that the disadvantage mentioned in 2.(2)(a) > would be accepted by the PostgreSQL development community. > If it is accepted, I think Approach 2 is smarter. > Could you please provide your opinion on which > approach is preferable after comparing these two approaches? I didn't know #2 was possible, but given the great number of catalog entries, doing it in the SQL grammar seems cleaner to me. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: