Re: [DOCS] intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [DOCS] intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ZV11Gh7fB2G39jR9@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile (Christophe Courtois <christophe.courtois@dalibo.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] intagg.sgml: example wrongly named and does not compile
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:07:13PM +0200, Christophe Courtois wrote: > Le 21/04/2017 à 17:45, Tom Lane a écrit : > > Christophe Courtois <christophe.courtois@dalibo.com> writes: > >> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the > >> one-to-many table is a many-to-many. > > Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that > > it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it still makes sense without that > > restriction. Maybe better to add a unique constraint on > > one_to_many(left)? > > Perhaps the whole example can be simplified to get rid of the "left" > table, but I didn't intend to rewrite it. > > >> And my colleague Thibaut Madeleine has seen that the "CREATE TABLE > >> right" and "CREATE TABLE left" examples cannot compile due to the > >> reserved words. > > Ouch. Shows you how old this module is :-( > > Indeed. > > >> I propose the attached patch to fix that. > > Um, the attached file seems empty from here. > > Ooops, sorry. It is attached. I like this six year old patch so would like to apply it to master, attached. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: