On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 05:04:28PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> Having a GUC hook for the "max_slot_wal_keep_size" seemed OK to me. If
> the user overrides a GUC value (admittedly, maybe there is no reason
> why they would want to) then at least the hook will give an error,
> rather than us silently overwriting the user's value with -1.
>
> So, patch v4 LGTM, except it is better to include a test case.
Where's this v4? I may be missing, but it does not seem to be
attached to this thread..
--
Michael