Re: Logical replication is missing block of rows when sending initial sync?

> OK. found another case (maybe two).

OK, the other case is real. Different database. Same scenario.

Errors (3 because we have 3 missing fkeys):

#v+
ALTER TABLE ONLY c44s16539.assignment_overrides ADD CONSTRAINT fk_rails_58f8ee369b FOREIGN KEY (assignment_id)
REFERENCESc44s16539.assignments(id);
 
ERROR:  insert or update on table "assignment_overrides" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_58f8ee369b"
DETAIL:  Key (assignment_id)=(248083) is not present in table "assignments".

ALTER TABLE ONLY c44s16539.post_policies ADD CONSTRAINT fk_rails_cf2d119863 FOREIGN KEY (assignment_id) REFERENCES
c44s16539.assignments(id);
ERROR:  insert or update on table "post_policies" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_cf2d119863"
DETAIL:  Key (assignment_id)=(248083) is not present in table "assignments".

ALTER TABLE ONLY c44s16539.submissions ADD CONSTRAINT fk_rails_61cac0823d FOREIGN KEY (assignment_id) REFERENCES
c44s16539.assignments(id);
ERROR:  insert or update on table "submissions" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_61cac0823d"
DETAIL:  Key (assignment_id)=(248083) is not present in table "assignments".
#v-

In all cases the problem is missing c44s16539.assignments with is = 248083.

This time it looks that only one row is missing:

#v+
Pg14# select max(id) from c44s16539.assignments where id < 248083;
  max
────────
 248082
(1 row)

Pg14# select min(id) from c44s16539.assignments where id > 248083;
  min
────────
 248084
(1 row)
#v-

Schema is complicated. 76 columns. On pg12 side one column is dropped.
22 indexes, 9 fkeys from this table (assignments) to others, ~ 35 fkeys
pointing to this table (but only 3 have rows that reference the
missing record.

Some informationa bout the record:

#v+
Pg12# select ctid, xmin, cmin, xmax, cmax, id, created_at, updated_at from c44s16539.assignments where id = 248083 \gx
─[ RECORD 1 ]──────────────────────────
ctid       │ (24192,1)
xmin       │ 472291499
cmin       │ 12
xmax       │ 472291499
cmax       │ 12
id         │ 248083
created_at │ 2023-11-07 15:50:05.506077
updated_at │ 2023-11-07 15:51:28.738893
#v-

logs for when it was added to replication:

#v+
2023-11-07 15:47:27.898 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,39,"ALTER PUBLICATION",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/0,0,LOG,00000,"duration:1.476 ms",,,,,,,,,"psql"
 
2023-11-07 15:47:27.899 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,40,"idle",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/1209097693,0,LOG,00000,"statement:ALTER PUBLICATION focal14 ADD TABLE ONLY
c247s1094.messages_2022_50;",,,,,,,,,"psql"
2023-11-07 15:47:27.900 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,41,"ALTER PUBLICATION",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/0,0,LOG,00000,"duration:1.493 ms",,,,,,,,,"psql"
 
2023-11-07 15:47:27.900 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,42,"idle",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/1209097694,0,LOG,00000,"statement:ALTER PUBLICATION focal14 ADD TABLE ONLY
c44s16539.assignments;",,,,,,,,,"psql"
2023-11-07 15:47:27.902 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,43,"ALTER PUBLICATION",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/0,0,LOG,00000,"duration:1.936 ms",,,,,,,,,"psql"
 
2023-11-07 15:47:27.902 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,44,"idle",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/1209097695,0,LOG,00000,"statement:ALTER PUBLICATION focal14 ADD TABLE ONLY
c39s5131.messages_2023_20;",,,,,,,,,"psql"
2023-11-07 15:47:27.903 UTC,"postgres","dbname",2333,"[local]",654a5c0f.91d,45,"ALTER PUBLICATION",2023-11-07 15:47:27
UTC,6/0,0,LOG,00000,"duration:1.292 ms",,,,,,,,,"psql"
 
#v-

It is interesting that the time when the row was inserted (created_at) is
always "around" the time that the table was added to publication...

Just like with the other case, I can leave it in current state for
a day, so if you'd need more information from it, let me know.

Best regards,

depesz