Re: document deviation from standard on REVOKE ROLE
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: document deviation from standard on REVOKE ROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZULh4XMNF5JosdnL@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | document deviation from standard on REVOKE ROLE (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: document deviation from standard on REVOKE ROLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:03:48PM -0400, John Naylor wrote: > This is the other doc fix as suggested in > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20201027220555.GS4951%40momjian.us > > There is already a compatibility section, so put there. > -- > John Naylor > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml > index 35ff87a4f5..c8d5be92db 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/revoke.sgml > @@ -298,6 +298,12 @@ REVOKE admins FROM joe; > is required according to the standard, but <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> > assumes <literal>RESTRICT</literal> by default. > </para> > + > + <para> > + In the SQL standard, <command>REVOKE</command> only revokes the privilege > + as granted by the invoking role. In <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, > + this will also revoke privileges granted by other roles. > + </para> > </refsect1> > > <refsect1> John, should this 2020 patch still be applied? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: