Re: Document aggregate functions better w.r.t. ORDER BY
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Document aggregate functions better w.r.t. ORDER BY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZTrp6XhK0dFOC6Zz@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Document aggregate functions better w.r.t. ORDER BY ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Document aggregate functions better w.r.t. ORDER BY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:09:26PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:56 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:34:10PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > I would reword the existing note to be something like: > > > > The SQL Standard defines specific aggregates and their properties, > including > > which of DISTINCT and/or ORDER BY is allowed. Due to the extensible > nature of > > PostgreSQL it accepts either or both clauses for any aggregate. > > Uh, is this something in my patch or somewhere else? I don't think > PostgreSQL extensible is an example of syntax flexibility. > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES > > Note > The ability to specify both DISTINCT and ORDER BY in an aggregate function is a > PostgreSQL extension. > > I am pointing out that the first sentence of the existing note above seems to > be factually incorrect. I tried to make it correct - while explaining why we > differ. Though in truth I'd probably rather just remove the note. Agreed, removed, patch attached. This is just too complex to specify. > > We get enough complaints regarding "apparent ordering" that I would like > to > > add: > > > > As a reminder, while some DISTINCT processing algorithms produce sorted > output > > as a side-effect, only by specifying ORDER BY is the output order > guaranteed. > > Well, we need to create a new email thread for this and look at all the > areas is applies to since this is a much larger issue. > > I was hoping to sneak this one in regardless of the bigger picture issues, > since this specific combination is guaranteed to output ordered presently. No sneaking. ;-) It would be bad to document this unevenly because it sets expectations in other parts of the system if we don't mention it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: