Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZTXY9JNw63gt.HqCkFHv1@mail.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Timestamp reverse engeneering bug (Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Timestamp reverse engeneering bug
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
I'm using my phone right now so I can't check, but I'm pretty sure that's not a bug. Isn't timestamptz a timestamp with timezonee.g. 2002-02-21 19:00:00+00? Anyway, pgAdmin gets this by looking up the typename from pg_type using pg_attribute.atttypid (iirc) so if it's broken forone type it probably would be for all types. I'll check when I can... Regards, Dave _____________Original message ____________ Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Timestamp reverse engeneering bug Sender: Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:57:05 +0000 Hi Dave, Table definition with timestamps under 7.2 return "timestamptz". Cheers, Jean-Michel POURE ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: