Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ZT-3KgndQLQ_bnFy@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:22:08PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > If I change STD_FUZZ_FACTOR to something like 1.0000001 then the plans > no longer change when I do: > > alter server loopback options (add fdw_tuple_cost '0.01'); > <run the query> > alter server loopback options (drop fdw_tuple_cost); > <run the query> > > Ordinarily, I'd not care too much about that, but I did test the > performance of one of the plans and the new plan came out slower than > the old one. > > I'm not exactly sure how best to proceed on this in the absence of any feedback. I think you just go and change it. Your number is better than what we have, and if someone wants to suggest a better number, we can change it later. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: