Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag
Дата
Msg-id ZSzjVRaLMbwg-9gi@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 10:47:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree that that probably is the root cause, and we should fix it
> by bumping up max_worker_processes in this test.

Thanks.  I've fixed this one now.  Let's see if mamba is OK after
that.

> If there's actually a defensible reason for the C code to act
> like that, then all the call sites need to have checks for
> a null result.

We're just talking about a test module and an ERROR in the same
fashion as autoprewarm makes things more predictible for the TAP
script, IMO.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can concurrent create index concurrently block each other?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_logical_emit_message() misses a XLogFlush()