Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZSW3tKL_-shcBkCm@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggestion for deprecated spellings (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 08:17:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:17:14PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:07:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:19:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > > >> From time to time some spelling for given command gets obsolete, yet it is > > > >> shown in the syntax on "equal rights" as other valid clauses. > > > > > > > We don't need to show all _supported_ syntaxes in the "Synopsis" > > > > section, so we could just remove them. > > > > > > IIRC, there is precedent in COPY for moving obsolete alternatives > > > to a separate part of the man page. I'd prefer that to just > > > removing them, because then there is no documentation to help > > > someone understand what an old SQL script is doing. > > > > Yeah, I remember that with COPY. t.kitynski@gmail.com, please us that > > as a guide. Thanks. > > I developed the attached patch to move the deprecated clauses to the > bottom. Applied to master. I didn't want to backpatch a command syntax adjustment like this. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: