Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ZRNhIUvJh+T63Jp+@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 01:52:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 02:37:24PM -0700, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > > Maybe. It will require changes in other parts of this doc. > > Thinking (here: https://gitlab.com/postgres/postgres/-/merge_requests/18/diffs) > > > > Meanwhile, attached is v2 > > > > thanks for the comments > > I looked over this issue thoroughly and I think I see the cause of the > confusion. In step 8 we say: > > 8. Stop both servers > Streaming replication and log-shipping standby servers can remain > --- > running until a later step. > > Of course this has to be "must" and it would be good to explain why, > which I have done in the attached patch. > > Secondly, in step 9 we say "verify the LSNs", but have a parenthetical > sentence that explains why they might not match: > > (There will be a mismatch if old standby servers were shut down before > the old primary or if the old standby servers are still running.) > > People might take that to mean that it is okay if this is the reason > they don't match, which is incorrect. Better to tell them to keep the > streaming replication and log-shipping servers running so we don't need > that sentence. > > The instructions are already long so I am hesitant to add more text > without a clear purpose. Patch applied back to PG 11. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: