Re: Wrong note in the information schema section?
От | Daniel Westermann (DWE) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong note in the information schema section? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZR0P278MB0920FFE2427CAE3BCD6DC7F0D2CC9@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong note in the information schema section? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Monday, August 30, 2021, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: On Monday, August 30, 2021, Daniel Westermann (DWE) <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> wrote: >>>Practically speaking there must be some level of scope where a duplicate name error can occur. All the docs say is thatthe schema >>>scope is not it. You've demonstrated that it is the table scope where duplication of names is detected. >>Thanks, David. The sentence above is still misleading, at least according to my understanding. >Create a second table and add a constraint of the same name to it. >And your error is actually because the name of the unique index backing the constraint is a problem, not the name of theconstraint >itself. Try naming a check constraint. Thanks, now it makes sense: postgres=# create table t1 ( a int ); CREATE TABLE postgres=# create table t2 ( a int ); CREATE TABLE postgres=# alter table t1 add constraint chk1 check ( a > 1 ); ALTER TABLE postgres=# alter table t2 add constraint chk1 check ( a > 1 ); Regards Daniel
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: