Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures
От | Daniel Westermann (DWE) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZR0P278MB010531F3376F873D0F2FC8E9D2FA0@ZR0P278MB0105.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hi Bruce, >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html >> Description: >> >> Hi, >> >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well? >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document. >Does this seem sufficient? Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend? Regards Daniel
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: