Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Дата
Msg-id ZQ-UGWtLyHQ9shlp@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:53:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> No new thoughts. I'm still all in favor of this. Thanks for picking it up.

Okay, thanks.  I guess that nobody would complain if I were to apply
that..

> At some point we should completely ban the use of "long".

Indeed, or Windows decides that making long 8-byte is wiser, but I
doubt that's ever going to happen on backward-compatibility ground.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: