On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 07:04:53AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> I'd prefer the singular form. There is a lot of places where it's already used
> (pg_database, pg_user, pg_namespace...to name a few) and it looks like that using
> the plural form are exceptions.
Okay, fine by me. Also, I would remove the "wait_event_" prefixes to
the field names for the attribute names.
> Yeah, now that af720b4c50 is done, I'll add the custom wait events handling
> in v6.
Thanks. I guess that the hash tables had better remain local to
wait_event.c.
--
Michael