Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZNTJP9Y6fIoJCJ8f@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re:Re: BUG #18034: Accept the spelling "+infinity" in datetime input is not accurate
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 10:53:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > We call our timestamp type datetime in some cases, e.g.: > > ... > > I see it in a few other places. Should we rename it other places too? > > I thought datetime was just a short-hand for our date-time types. > > I don't see much reason to change anything here. "Datetime" is not > a perfectly strict classification, eg it might or might not include > "interval" depending on context, and I don't want to try to make > that exact. > > A more specific release note entry could be "Accept the spelling > '+infinity' for datetime types that accept infinity"; but I'm not > sure it's worth the extra verbiage. Yeah, that was my analysis too. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: