Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZH4QXnfZH6WfCo6W@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 01:26:00PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > On 05/06/2023 11:18, Tom Lane wrote: > > For the record, I think this will be a disaster. There is far too much > > code that will get broken, largely silently, and much of it is not > > under our control. > > I fully agreed with Tom. > > First, it is not clear what are the benefits of architecture change? > > Performance? > > Development becomes much more complicated and error-prone. I agree the costs of going threaded have been reduced with compiler and library improvements, but I don't know if they are reduced enough for the change to be a net benefit, except on Windows where the process creation overhead is high. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: