Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZGmPocUZ3cl9VQm+@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 11:21:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 09:33:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> With less then 48 hours to beta 1 packaging, I have made this change and > >> adjusted internal variable to match. > > > The buildfarm and cfbot seem unhappy with 9c0a0e2. It looks like there are > > a few remaining uses of gss_accept_deleg to rename. I'm planning to commit > > the attached patch shortly. > > I thought the plan was to also rename the libpq "gssdeleg" connection > parameter and so on? I can look into that tomorrow, if nobody beats > me to it. Oh, I didn't consider those. I thought we would leave libpq alone since those are often supplied on the command line and there are existing short-style libpq options, e.g., gssencmode, krbsrvname, sslcrl. I am fine with such a change though. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: