Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZGlnW3CCQHV3cdZ3@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready (Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:08:18PM -0400, Isaac Morland wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 22:59, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sorry for changing the subject line..... > > these two commits seems not mentioned. > > > On a similar topic, should every committed item from the commitfest be > mentioned, or only ones that are significant enough? > > I’m wondering because I had a role in this very small item, yet I don’t see it > listed in the psql section: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4133/ > > It’s OK if we don’t mention every single change, I just want to make sure I > understand. I have never considered the presence of an item in the commitfest as an indicator of importance to be in the release notes. The major release notes, for me, is a balance of listing the most visible changes without going into unmanageable detail. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: