Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZDYG0GkWQa3uZ8yI@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h
Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings, * Jonathan S. Katz (jkatz@postgresql.org) wrote: > On 4/10/23 11:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > > > > IOW, maybe it'd be okay to de-revert 3d4fa227b and add documentation > > > > saying that --with-gssapi requires MIT Kerberos not Heimdal. > > > > > I'd be happy with that and can add the appropriate documentation noting > > > that we require MIT Kerberos. Presumably the appropriate step at this > > > point would be to check with the RMT? > > > > Yeah, RMT would have final say at this stage. > > > > If you pull the trigger, a note to buildfarm-members would be > > appropriate too, so people will know if they need to remove > > --with-gssapi from animal configurations. > > The RMT discussed this thread and agrees to a "de-revert" of the "Add > support for Kerberos delegation" patch, provided that: > > 1. The appropriate documentation is added AND > 2. The de-revert occurs no later than 2023-04-15 (upper bound 2023-04-16 > 0:00 AoE). > > There's an open item[1] for this task. Understood. Please find attached the updated patch with changes to the commit message to indicate that we now require MIT Kerberos, an additional explicit check for gssapi_ext.h in configure.ac/configure, along with updated documentation explicitly saying we require MIT Kerberos for GSSAPI support. I'll plan to push this tomorrow. Of course, suggestions/improvements on documentation or anything else always welcome. Thanks all! Stephen
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: