Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h

Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > Pushed, thanks again to everyone.
> > I'll monitor the buildfarm and assuming there isn't anything unexpected
> > then I'll mark the open item as resolved now.
>
> The Debian 7 (Wheezy) members of the buildfarm (lapwing, skate, snapper)
> are all getting past the gssapi_ext.h check you added and then failing
> like this:
>
> ccache gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror=vla
-Wendif-labels-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g
-O2-Werror -I../../../src/include  -DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2
-I/usr/include/et -c -o be-gssapi-common.o be-gssapi-common.c 
> be-gssapi-common.c: In function 'pg_store_delegated_credential':
> be-gssapi-common.c:110:2: error: unknown type name 'gss_key_value_element_desc'
> be-gssapi-common.c:111:2: error: unknown type name 'gss_key_value_set_desc'
> be-gssapi-common.c:113:4: error: request for member 'key' in something not a structure or union
> be-gssapi-common.c:114:4: error: request for member 'value' in something not a structure or union
> be-gssapi-common.c:115:7: error: request for member 'count' in something not a structure or union
> be-gssapi-common.c:116:7: error: request for member 'elements' in something not a structure or union
> be-gssapi-common.c:119:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gss_store_cred_into'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Debian 7 has been EOL five years or so, so I don't mind saying "get a
> newer OS or disable gssapi".  However, is it worth adding another
> configure check to fail a little faster with whatever Kerberos
> version this is?  Checking that gss_store_cred_into() exists
> seems like the most obvious one of these things to test for.

Sure, I can certainly do that and agreed that it makes sense to check
for gss_store_cred_into().

How about the attached which just switches from testing for
gss_init_sec_context to testing for gss_store_cred_into?

Thanks!

Stephen