Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:17PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> A minor comment for the README is that now we have five support
> functions not four.
>
> - outcome.  (For some classes of node types, you don't need all four support
> + outcome.  (For some classes of node types, you don't need all five support

Right, missed that.  How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
and make that simpler?  I would propose:
"For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
functions."
--
Michael